newman, Aresius and Infinity238,
Thank you for quick and/or useful responses.
Yeah, I understood the situation
and will update size comparisons in a few days.
Quote:
Originally Posted by A_Pickle  I'm kind of a n00b at making good, detailed, crazy-awesome 3D ships... so I've got some questions that pop into my head from time to time.
As of now, I'm wondering... how long did those images take to render, and on what hardware/software?... |
It took about 1 hour to render (with middle level anti-aliasing and radiosity on) the first image of this thread.
Software: LightWave3D 8.2 on WindowsXP
PC: Pentium4 3GHz, 768MB mem. (made 4 years ago...
)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lonewriter you know how much I like it. The only thing I'm not fond of is the name. Otherwise, it's great... |
It's always difficult to decide a name of a original vessel...in this time, I wanted to give some strange and unused name to her.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jacob Collstrup ...Many times I might think that that particular model is not my style, or I just plain don't like the concept of the design. But what ALWAYS impresses me is these pictures...it ALWAYS looks like you can just grap the model off the screen!! Particularly this one. It looks like a little plastic model you can just grab and start painting!! Its SO awesome!! And I like the model too in this case! 
Jacob |
Quote:
Originally Posted by fongsaunder Great job, that armor plate reminds me of the TOS for some reason 9I dunno why) |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nop Great, I really like this model. It's good to see a battlestar that looks heavily armored and survivable (instead of plastered with obvious kill-me-here locations). Also lookes very well thought through and workable. |
Thank you for encouradging comments. I wanted to design heavily armored vessel which had functional and kinda funny appearance. I feel that she may not be bad...
btw, I also remember TOS GALACTICA in an early stage of her modeling...
