| |||||||
| 2D WIPs Post your 2D related works-in-progress (WIPs). |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) | |
| SFM Nugget Join Date: Sep 2007 Age: 30
Posts: 52
Downloads: 4 Uploads: 0 | New Akira-Class Bridge Design I have never been sastisfied with using a galaxy bridge for the Akira. In my opnion it just doesn't fit the ship. Niether does the Soverigns bridge or the Intrepids. So with that in mind I set out to design my own. While searching the Internet I found ASR's Bureau of Information and there Coventry-class ship. I saw there bridge design created by Edward Bell and decided to alter it and turn it into the bridge for the Akira. I know there is no credit on the pic but when its totally completed I will add it. Comments welcome!! Quote:
| |
| Last edited by Wisper; 05-25-2008 at 03:51 PM. | ||
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| SFM Oracle | Looks nice. But: -one turbolift is too few. Many modern starships have more than one. Exception: Defiant, but since the bridge is level to the first deck, it has two doors to access the deck. -Science 1? I don't see a Science 2.. |
| See the Shadows of Darkness, Hear the Scream of Cruelty... That's why I've became a Warrior of Heart, Defend the one you like, Guard the one you love... | |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| SFM Nugget Join Date: Sep 2007 Age: 30
Posts: 52
Downloads: 4 Uploads: 0 | I was thinking the same thing about the turbolift but wasn't sure about where I wanted to place it. I had thought about putting a Science II station in but decided not to. Need to fix that. Edit: How does this look with two turbolifts? |
| Last edited by Wisper; 04-24-2008 at 05:58 AM. | |
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| SFM Nugget Realname: David Turnbull Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 40
Downloads: 0 Uploads: 0 | That looks really good. I never understood the sovereigns bridge layout. Way to complicated with people just thrown everywhere. Intrepid wasn't bad for an explorer, but this looks good for a tactical ship. My only complaint is fighter ops looks like a stressful job standing in such a small screen. |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) | |
| SFM Guru Realname: Jack McMillan Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Australia
Posts: 239
Downloads: 1 Uploads: 0 | Quote:
This bridge looks alot more practical. | |
| | |
| | #7 (permalink) | |
| SFM Nugget Join Date: Sep 2007 Age: 30
Posts: 52
Downloads: 4 Uploads: 0 | Quote:
On another note I did some test work. Got both turbolifts in but and had to enlarge the MSD so it was to actual scale. When I did that The back area got kinda cramped. Here is what I came up with. | |
| Last edited by Wisper; 04-24-2008 at 05:56 AM. | ||
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| SFM Nugget Join Date: May 2006 Age: 24
Posts: 127
Downloads: 0 Uploads: 0 | Are those Delta Flyer-esque controls at the helm? Looks interesting. From a person PoV, I would swap Fighter Ops with Science 1 on the first picture, as iirc the Akira-class' primary function is as a carrier, so it probably wouldn't be sent on big science missions too often, so no need for alot of space for your science console. Looks great as a plan, will you be turning this into a model? Hope so. |
| | |
| | #9 (permalink) | |
| SFM Nugget Join Date: Sep 2007 Age: 30
Posts: 52
Downloads: 4 Uploads: 0 | Quote:
As having never seen the controls of the Delta Flyer I couldn't tell you, but its mostly just the top of the panel in my mind with the control surface roughly vertical. I think swapping them may actually be a good idea. I was trying to make them roughly the same size, but that didn't work to well. I would love to see this done as model but alas I am no good at things like that. If anyone else would like to when I am done feel free. | |
| | |
| | #10 (permalink) |
| SFM Nugget Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 137
Downloads: 0 Uploads: 0 | your bridge looks great. your akira-class ship is definitly a warship/carrier. so have a look on the needed interactions on the bridge in terms of stations. tactical has to interact with flight deck ops/ fighters and also with science, because they provide the sensor data. communications is also a vital element in this interaction. on a secondary level, tactical interacts with the operations controllers (mission and marine) conn or helm needs primary the interaction with engineering and science; during combat situations also with tactical. are ther no heads? what does the crew with exigencies? |
| | |