View Single Post
Old 06-02-2008, 03:35 PM   #7 (permalink)
Huntaer
SFM Nugget

 
Join Date: May 2008
Age: 21
Posts: 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRML View Post
to give you an idea, I completed an 800k/900k sized model in lightwave 7 with a geforce 2 mx440 and 512mb of ram, it was hard to work with towards the end but I did it, when I moved up to a new machine with a geforce 6600gt and 1gb of ram it was much easier to work with

I'm on a much much nicer machine now, 8gb of ram, 9800gtx, intel qx9650 - but I'd still say my previous machine was fine to work with
Quote:
Originally Posted by nirvaaa
Your within the system requirements of maya 2008. I have maya on my computer and it runs fine.

I have a
2.26 ghz P4
2 gigs of ram
512mb video card (Radeon X1650)

The mac OS could be eating too many video resources. I keep mine on a stripped down windows XP system. By stripped down I mean it doesn't run/load anything I don't need for maya. And generally speaking autodisk produces don't mix well with mac PCs.

The Area | Maya 2008 and Mac Leopard OSX
I think you guys just convinced me to get the tower and not another iMac. I think that with Maya, Final Cut pro, and iDvD (I still have yet to fully comprehend DvD Studio Pro), most of my disk space is taken up already. The message I seem to be getting is the more ram and the higher the graphics card, the better. With the Towers, I can add up to 32 gigs of Ram (but who needs that much?) and I can have several graphics cards.

I'm thinking that for now, I'll go with this configuration:

Two 2.8GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon (unless y'all think I should go higher and get Two 3.0GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon)
4 Gigs of RAM (I might go with 8, but that's a bit expensive for macs)
500 gigs of memory (only one bay)
4 x ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT 256MB (or 1 NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT 512MB)

I'll get it eventually, just not right away so I got time to think about it.
Huntaer is offline   Reply With Quote