Yet more Trek Crap! TNG explorer

[nhall]

He's right though. People being lazy and reading "the original post" looking for FAQ's is the wrong answer. If you're going to make creative comments on a project such as this, you really need to read what's going on, and fully understand what's up before posting the same question multiple times. Especially since the photorp tubes in question were discussed, eh, five pages ago, if that?

I don't care if you agree with Freak (or myself) or not, don't anyone start a flamewar over a scrapped project. Maybe if we're all extra special good, MKF will reconsider....

Cheers,
Nick

[MadKoiFish]

Originally Posted by 3DTEKO6

Care to clarify who you're herding into the dumb lazy ass category?

There's something called FAQ. Study it. Learn it. Use it. If being bombarded by PMs and questions was too much to handle, post a FAQ in the original post where I sought them in the first place.

I'm sure many others asked questions, calling so many aspiring artists lazy asses is a real low comment. Real low.

So what Im suppose to write a faq because people cannot take the effort to follow a thread? Im sorry Im here for crits not parroting what I have covered in detail once before. NOW yes the thread is freaking huge. But this particular matter was covered MORE THAN ONCE and covered RECENTLY
SO YES LAZY is the proper term. Saying dumb ok I cannot or willnot judge that but lazy I can judge


Kazadum's comments: EVERYONE of them I had covered multiple times. Every time I post a image of this yacht I have to parrot myself. I am here to share a WIP not write fraking FAQs

1. > torps do not take up the same ammount of space as modern ammunition. Its antimatter for gods sake.
2. > Onboard weapons are mostly micro torps (READ THE FRAKING TECH MANUALS) probes and any larger units are puled in via a rail system. AS WITH every torp system.
3. > Volume Look at it theres plenty 3 DECKS of it. A run about is only one deck and look at all the crap it has.
4. > why torps, well if this is to be used other than evac conditions maybe it could work for a remote sensor craft when more than one ship is needed IE doppler scans or LOS sensor equip etc. SO what else do you use TUBES for in trek?? PROBES DUH
5. > why the hell do I need landing pads? does every thing under 300meters have to have stupid landing pads? Why when it has transporters, and every other friggen shuttle on the ship does as well? Logic dont waste volume on useless items. If the ship were to atmo it would land as a glider does. Intention is to never atmo.
6. > ships roles DEFENCE of evac posds, usualy if your evacing its more than likely your under attack. As well as provide a much needed FTL ship to ferry people or search for a more permanent solution than floating around in space. Secondary use would be for back up sensor platform or a secondary system. FOr a multipoint sweep or scouting multiple locations when no other ship can arrive in time to cover a event.

Now let me see a explanation WHY I have to do this over and over? and why I should spend hours writing a FAQ not to mention mantain it???


NOW I know I was a bit ticked yesterday to begin with, more frustrated with other things but this is something that has been ragging me for some time. It isnt a recent issue the PMs are annoying considering how some are worded IE "Im good give me now" Or people emailing me the SAME damned message 7 or 8 times. That or Pming me the same message they emailed me. Im sick of filtering out REAL emails from this crap. If you gotta propose projects do it in the thread. Begging someone is just plain annoying period I have a DAMNED right to demand it stop. If I ever do finish this it WILL NOT be released publicly. PERIOD.

NOW coming back I was tempted to write "Well Ill update less and still work on it" at this stage Im about to leave SFM alltogether. It is becoming too much like the English imageboards. People are to lazy to make a effort and expect everything to be given to them on DEMAND. Then when they are told off they decide to have a temper tantrum, sorta like what I am doing now. :tantrum: Then proceed to argue a ueseless point all together ignoring any rebuttal with the reason its not valid.

In summary
1 why should I spend time writting faqs and parroting myself instead of modeling?

2 why am I in the wrong to ask that people STOP pming and emailing me about RPG projects or BEGGING me for the mesh. (gimmie gimmie gimmie)

3 why should I care anymore?

I will continue working on the ship but I will have to consider if I will post updates if at all.

{{edited the fukings into frakings.}}


gotta love the post to complain about broken images.

[nhall]

*Sigh* Ok. Let's all calm down here, people.

Look at how many posts MKF has. Look at how long MKF has been a member. I KNOW he was here LONG before the Great Crash. Now, after all that. All the loyalty he's shown to this community, all you "gimme gimme" people are chasing him off.

Bravo, assholes. Bravo.

This is really starting to piss ME off. And I'm, for the most part, an easygoing, carefree person.

This is usually the part where I crack a joke, attempting to make light of the situation. I'm not going to do that this time, though. Not when someone's considering leaving the community we all love so much.

Everyone. Take a look at what's going on, and stop bugging MKF. When people start getting chased off from these sort of things it's time to stop and think about things before annoying the **** out of one of our best members. Especially when they've posted their frustration with it umpteen times.

Now. I'm off to ask Spry to look into this some. I hope this situation is resolved. Immediately.

Cheers,
Nick

[MadKoiFish]

lol
situation is solved I just have desisions to make. That I dont think staff can make for me. Unless they deem it so. O_o
To clarify the Pms and email were annoying at best, but not the cause.

for now here are some of the images yanked so new people can at least see the ship.



bleah some of these are large for the rez. . . no wonder I was running out of space.

[MadKoiFish]

eh one too many it seems. . .
Attachment 20609

oops didnt include the one with mr ugly for scale
Attachment 20610

[cobywan]

It's a beautiful ship. it would be nice to keep following it's development.

At the very least it would be nice to see it in it's final form when done.

[Aresius]

I agree... It's a nice one...

SFM would suffer an incapable loss if you'd stop posting your ideas and how they develope...
Please rethink it...

[REL777]

MKF is one of the most talented modelers I've seen anywhere, I never miss one of his projects. I'm amazed at how fast he can put things out and with the level of detail. But when you have that much talent you're going to make enemie because of jealosy or whatever dumb reason they have. Best thing to do is ignore them and go on I think.

And these uber fan boys that will argue over rivets and small stupid **** are really the one's that should be ignored, I've noticed the one's that complain the most are the one's that do the least, total losers.

Anyway it would be a huge shame if you stopped working on this one, damn.

[3DTEKO6]

No nono, MKF.. relax. I never ever suggested you make a FAQ about fictional specs of a starship. Just a quick FAQ when you start a thread for a demanding model. You know, the question most commonly asked would be "Are you releasing this mesh?" and of course, write your answer. There- issue solved, and you can ignore the late ones who cannot read. Saves you from becoming the parrot.

As far as the people crying over specs of a ship- now that's just damn annoying. Or even PMing about said specs is even worse. So..

I just wanted to clear that mess up for everyone. I look forward to more updates.

[JustinDixon]

you're not really supposed to ask the "Are you going to release this model" anyway Usually you'll get shot.