Go Back   Scifi-Meshes.com > General Discussions > General Discussion

General Discussion Post, chat, or discuss topics related to science fiction, 3D graphics, or something close to this.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-20-2008, 10:06 PM   #21 (permalink)
SFM Nugget
 
Mong0ose's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Age: 25
Posts: 71
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
i enjoyed it, was a good film, nice to see something different for once. Great effects and score too
Mong0ose is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2008, 04:28 PM   #22 (permalink)
SFM Guru
 
iOSYS's Avatar

 
Realname: Alex
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Vancouver
Age: 19
Posts: 429
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0
Send a message via MSN to iOSYS
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shadowman99
1) Computer science problems:
Anyone else wonder why the computer didn't tell the guy he forgot to angle the shield when he first broke the ship? Seemed a teeny bit odd that it has no fail safes, especially for something as simple as angling all the mirrors towards the sun.

I thought it was pretty Ok. Kind of a flimsy premise for an entire movie, it almost felt like a short film stretched out actually. For me the weird storytelling style reflects that.

I don't even mind some of the scientific... flaws. whats inside the film (not the explanation) is not outside the realm of possibility. I only mind things that actually start to violate the laws of physics directly. The nonspecific nature of the bomb, and the problem in the sun mean that there isn't too much stuff for me to be like "THAT COULD NEVER WORK!" about. You just assume some scenario has got these events moving.

One part that I wonder about: What era does the film take place in? The sets are all like... Modern spacecrafty, yet they're advanced enough to have artificial gravity, and it's obviously far enough in the future for this problem in the sun to have been developing for awhile.

This could mean up to millions of years in the future, and yet they still don't have anything better than a Manhattan sized nuclear pile. It shall be called the Manhattan project!
iOSYS is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2008, 04:36 PM   #23 (permalink)
SFM Oracle
 
Ozylot's Avatar

2nd Place Award - Sensei Challenge 5 Sensei Challenge Honorable Member Award 
Total Awards: 2 (more» ...)
 
Realname: Carl
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ont,Canada
Age: 26
Posts: 5,708
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by iOSYS View Post
...

One part that I wonder about: What era does the film take place in? The sets are all like... Modern spacecrafty, yet they're advanced enough to have artificial gravity, and it's obviously far enough in the future for this problem in the sun to have been developing for awhile.

This could mean up to millions of years in the future, and yet they still don't have anything better than a Manhattan sized nuclear pile. It shall be called the Manhattan project!
I was under the impression that it was the near future, all the tech seems fairly plausible now. And about the gravity, that was a hollywood blunder, the only part of the ship that should have had gravity was those spinning pods on the outside of the ship. (otherwise, why the heck where they spinning?!)

The only other source of gravity might be the bomb itself, something that size would likley have some sort of very minor gravitational pull. Which, I think they may have been trying to depict when that crazy mutant guy dropped him over the side of the bomb.

- Ozy - A proud supporter of 3DScifi.com and SciFiers Anonymous
Current WIP: My site (Notepad :D )
Old Stuff: Gallery pics and wips...(Wings3D, Kerkythea & Bryce)
Ozylot is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2008, 05:10 PM   #24 (permalink)
SFM Obsessed
 
JeffrySG's Avatar
SFM Donor!
 
Realname: Jeff
Join Date: May 2006
Location: New York City
Posts: 2,355
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
Yes, that is true about the gravity field of the bomb itself.

There is a pretty good commentary on the DVD from the actual science adviser a physicist from England I believe where they talk about many of these topics. The director commentary is pretty good as well.

JeffrySG is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

« - | - »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0 Release Candidate 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS